Battlefield 1, Watch Dogs 2, Titanfall 2, Resident Evil 7

Field of honor 1 [DX11]

Whether you'atomic number 75 mind controlling messenger pigeons surgery moonlighting as a tank number one wood, either rocking hors is best enjoyed with Vega 56. We saw a nice little bump in performance at 1080p and a solid 13% gain at 4K. For our resolution of choice Vega 56 offers 11% more performance o'er the GTX 1070 which is certainly a noteworthy increase and a great result for the chromatic team up in Battlefield 1.

WATCH_DOGS2

AMD lacks the delirious device driver hacks they indigence to take the lead in See Dogs 2 and as a result Vega 56 falls short at some 1080p and 4K. we was in reality very surprised to find the GTX 1070 providing 15% more frames at 4K. That said even at 1440p things were getting outside from the new Radeon GPU as it was 7% slower with an average out of 58 FPS, so a bit of a dissatisfactory result here.

Titanfall 2

Typically Titanfall 2 has been a game that's preferred the blood-red team in the past so we was quite surprised to examine the GTX 1070 matching Vega 56 in this form of address. Even at 4K the Radeon GPU wasn't fit to run away with it. We picture pretty often same performance at 1440p and then spell not a bad resultant for AMD, we had expected them to catch a handy win here.

House physician Evil 7: Biohazard

Other game where we expected AMD to do well was Resident Evil 7: Biohazard and this clock they do indeed detach with the win. That said Vega 56 wasn't much faster than the Eumenides X in this rubric, at to the lowest degree at 1080p, the Fury X does drop away massively at 4K. That aforementioned before it's 4GB HBM buffer limits performance the Craze X does look very mighty at 1440p and is sporting a few frames slower than the Vega 56 GPU which seemed unlikely. In any sheath a winnings here for AMD.